<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Search PageRank vs Microsoft Search BrowseRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hasan-online.com/2008/08/05/google-search-pagerank-vs-microsoft-search-browserank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hasan-online.com/2008/08/05/google-search-pagerank-vs-microsoft-search-browserank/</link>
	<description>SEO Consultants London &#124; SEO Consultancy Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:23:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pittsburgh SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.hasan-online.com/2008/08/05/google-search-pagerank-vs-microsoft-search-browserank/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Pittsburgh SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hasan-online.com/?p=278#comment-472</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point. I was just doing some research and thought about this new BrowseRank idea and thought for myself that it was also quite easily manipulated. All one would have to do would be to keep going to their website or keep their browser open with their website. And you know some spam or black hat guru is going to create a program that will do just that for you probably running in the background of you&#039;re computer. I agree, from what I&#039;ve heard it does not sound like a viable ranking solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point. I was just doing some research and thought about this new BrowseRank idea and thought for myself that it was also quite easily manipulated. All one would have to do would be to keep going to their website or keep their browser open with their website. And you know some spam or black hat guru is going to create a program that will do just that for you probably running in the background of you&#8217;re computer. I agree, from what I&#8217;ve heard it does not sound like a viable ranking solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

